257
the
have had to be taken to ascertais proper value of estates.
7. If Mr. Thomson had had
Cause to believe that in this or
amy
octer case full duty had not been paid
1vas
to
to
at one or
15
his duty
refer take the course laid down by law (see section 3 of Or de 13 of 1894): And it is a remarkable Coincidence that the case he has fixed upon is one which was dealt with at a time when the titular office of the Department of which he is the locum tenens, was in office, - an indirect attack therefore against his
predecessor.
8. As this is the 2nd time I have had to complain of
the conduct o
this
of
offien (6. S.0.1285 of 1878) in making allega-
tions Con c
concerning my
insufficient
Ꮽ
Department on
or erroneous information,
I beg to call for It is Excellency
the Governor.
interference. Mr Thomson's inexperience
may go bust
ao
towards condoning his offence
he is
eindently not aware of the
consequences of bringing charges of neglect which he is unable to substantiate,
against the head of
an important department
B.
Appendix B _cuntinnen).
252
421
[repened on regrann's letter of Sch. 15, 1902, pera. it is time he should be properly dire clic
Most respectfully submitted for
the information of St. E. the Governor.
(2d) J. W.A. K.
Registrar
30.11.
1.98.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.